[Logwatch-Devel] http filter
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:35:50 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Michael Romeo wrote:
> I didn't take it personally,
I'm happy to hear that
> I do understand that it doesn't meet your needs in it's current form.
sorry, but... yes :(
> I didn't intentionally leave out anything, I just don't have the depth
> of knowledge to cover all of the different content types.
does anyone has? (well... maybe Linus only ;) )
> Jeffery wrote the patch I was referring to, it is in the CVS.
now I see it.
The name of the option deceived me... I think that it's not acurate (but
it's only my opinion, forget it).
> It allows you to set $ignore_error_hacks in the conf file. If it is set
> then only other records that are not known hacks with a response code
> less than 400 are listed. It really doesnĄŻt address your needs until
> the content_types is more robust, sorry.
I'll try to feel it.
> I don't understand what you mean by "rescue option", why shouldn't the
> script be configurable by site?
yes, should be.
> I was using this definition from
well.... I should be looking later RFC's....
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski
worth to see: http://www.againsttcpa.com/
CPU not found - software emulation...